Intelligence Topic · Last updated 2026-08-03

    Case Studies

    Each case study documents an engagement in anonymised form: the presenting facts, the investigative approach, the evidentiary output and the limits encountered. Client identifiers, addresses, entity names and jurisdiction-identifying details are removed before publication.

    They are published as method illustrations. They are not marketing claims, and none of them asserts that assets were or could be recovered.

    8 indexed resources

    Scope of this topic

    • ·Presenting facts and instruction scope
    • ·Investigative sequence and analytical decisions
    • ·Evidentiary output delivered to counsel or authorities
    • ·Documented limits and unresolved elements

    Case Studies resources

    Frequently asked questions

    How are case studies anonymised?
    Party names, addresses, wallet identifiers, transaction hashes, exact dates and jurisdiction-identifying detail are removed or generalised. What remains is the methodology and the evidentiary structure.
    Do case studies indicate what result my matter would achieve?
    No. Each matter turns on its own facts, the cooperation of third parties and institutional decisions. Case studies illustrate approach and documentation standards only.

    Continue across the Intelligence Center

    Intelligence Center
    Author
    SEQRIA Research Team emblem
    SEQRIA Research TeamInvestigative research unit, SEQRIA
    • Cyber Intelligence
    • Blockchain Investigations
    • Digital Forensics

    The SEQRIA Research Team is the investigative research unit of SEQRIA, specialising in cyber intelligence, blockchain investigations and digital forensics.

    Its work focuses on digital asset investigations, blockchain transaction analysis, cyber incident investigations and technical evidence collection. Published material is reviewed internally before release.

    About the research team